“A Gold Key”
With the 2014 election just a few
days off, there are many anxious to see change in the politics of the U.S.
Senate. Regardless of which party
you support, those who have followed the news are keenly aware that something
is amiss In Washington. Political
infighting and corruption have been the hallmarks of the national scene in
recent years. There has been
virtually no progress made by a congress frozen in time by a do nothing senate,
a stonewalling majority leader and an administration that has failed to lead.
Update 11/5/2014
I began writing this before the
election but due to other intervening matters didn’t get very far. I now continue after the election with
the satisfaction of knowing that many others apparently shared my concerns.
My intention was not to publish a
political opinion but rather to use this example to emphasize a concept that I
have previously mentioned but now wish to further expand upon. It’s summed up in the age-old
question of why one person sees a glass as half full while another sees it as
half empty. How can two people
simultaneously view an event and have totally opposite impressions of what
happened? Questions of this kind
are often points of confusion for juries dealing with trial testimony. Two eyewitnesses to a crime can have
conflicting impressions of what transpired. In political matters, politicians and political commentators
routinely manipulate opinions.
“Spin” is the term applied to the practice of twisting facts in a less
than totally honest way to manipulate opinions and influence voters. Politicians frequently slip from spin
to outright lying, hence the joke question – “How can you tell when a
politician is lying”? Answer –
“His lips are moving”.
I’m merely using yesterday’s
election and current events to underscore the idea that we each have our own
view of reality and that individual “subjective realities” are far more
significant to our everyday lives than absolute reality, if in fact such a
thing actually exists.
I believe that this construct of
reality could become the “Gold Key” that could unlock the door to greatly
improved human relationships, respect, tolerance and understanding. The idea is really simple. If we all accept the idea that there
are multiple versions of reality, perhaps as many as there are people on earth,
then we can also reject the notion of there being an absolute reality that
everyone should accept and be guided by.
In other words, be o.k. with the idea that others think differently than
you. Don’t be threatened with the
knowledge that others have different viewpoints, different political
philosophies and different religions.
Don’t feel a need for others to agree with you in order for your
opinions to be validated. Have no driving compulsion to change anyone else’s
ideas so they see the world as you do.
Be comfortable with the way you see things but also respect the way
others see things, even though their views may be totally different from
yours. While such a view may not
be the cure all for the world’s problems, it could go a long way in that
direction. Wouldn’t it be great if
Muslims didn’t subscribe to instructions in the Koran to either convert the
infidels to Islam or kill them?
Wouldn’t it be great if political opponents could disagree without
expressing contempt and in some cases even hatred for each other? Wouldn’t it be great if we could all
accept the subjective realities of others without feeling a need to proclaim
them as wrong or ill informed? A
view of reality which rejects the notion of their being only one true absolute
reality in favor of many valid subjective realities may be a “Gold Key”
important to the long-term survival of our species.
I began with a somewhat political
statement which reveals part of my own subjective reality. You may have a totally opposite
viewpoint and believe that Harry Reid has been the best Senate Majority Leader
in years and that Barack Obama has been one of the best leaders ever to occupy
the White House. If we are able to
respect those divergent viewpoints as part of our respective subjective
realities, there should be no conflict.
It’s when one or the other feels compelled to proclaim the other wrong,
ignorant or worse that conflict often ensues. On a personal level, this conflict often runs a brief course
and is rapidly resolved. However,
on a larger scale involving many people, nations or ideologies, battles can
rage for years, even centuries.
No comments:
Post a Comment