Barack Obama’s
Report Card
Mr. Obama is known for grading others with a report card
format. Here’s my report card for
his performance over the last four years.
Report Card – September 2012
Student’s Name:
Barack Obama
Subject: Grade
Lowering
unemployment:
Results
2008
– 7.8% 2012
– 8.3% F
Improving
Standard of Living (mean household income)
Results 2008
- $54,000 2012
- $50,000
F
Reducing
energy costs (gasoline)
Results 2008
- $1.85/gal 2012
- $3.75/gal
F
Improve U.S. Financial Position (National Debt)
Results
2008
- $10 trillion 2012
- $16 trillion F-
I would also have to give Mr. Obama an F for
leadership. He has totally failed
at the leadership of bringing congress together to solve the important issues
of the day. Congress, as well as
all aspects of politics, is more polarized now than ever before.
When asked what grade he would give himself, he replied –
Incomplete
Mr., Obama does, however, deserve some As and Bs if we
can believe his self-assessments. His golf game, his basketball ability, his
pool shooting, his card playing, his singing, his reading ability and his
cooking, especially Chili, have all excelled.
(The Competitor in Chief, Jodi Kantor, The New York
Times, 9/2/2012)
Is a report card featuring F grades in all key subjects
or even as he grades himself, incomplete, good enough to deserve a second
term? Maybe being a camp counselor
is a better match for his talents.
Working with 8 – 10 year olds could also give him a great opportunity to
hone his leadership skills.
What do you think about this spending report?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05/24/who-is-the-smallest-government-spender-since-eisenhower-would-you-believe-its-barack-obama/
It's interesting to me how often two people can look at the same data and come to totally opposite conclusions. Politicians are experts at this. Both parties manipulate numbers and use them to create the impressions they believe will help them get what they want. One trick that many use to prove their point is to use some derivative of the raw data such as percentages to prove a point. This is also commonly done in the health/medical field. If you hear that a particular behavior leads to a 50% reduction in death due to disease "X", you tend to be impressed. However, when you learn that the baseline death rate is only 2 per 1000, reducing it to 1 per 1000 is far less impressive and, in fact, may be just statistical noise.
DeleteSo it is with politicians. They dazzle you with numbers to support their position, i.e., what many term "smoke and mirrors". They are as expert at slight of hand as are the magicians.
When I look at the raw data, I see that the National Debt increased $4.75 trillion during George Bush's 8 years (averaging about $594 billion/yr). While this indicates poor financial management, Obama has stepped hard on the accelerator, running up the National Debt another $3.69 trillion in four years (averaging $922 billion/yr).
You are so right about numbers being misrepresented. Here is an intersting website I found showing deficit/debt numbers of the past century: http://home.adelphi.edu/sbloch/deficits.html
DeleteYes and the whole thing is complicated by wars, need to support troops, national disasters and especially the makeup of congress. It's congress where spending programs are initiated. The president just gives his approval. My whole point is that I see little hope of stopping runaway debt unless we have a strong leader who will be willing and able to work with all of congress and commit to a balanced budget. I think this would require both reform of most all entitlement programs as well as significant tax reform. In that sense, I would love to see a president who focuses on bringing a rational decision making process to government rather than delivering favors to his/her base.
Delete