A more palatable approach would be for the government to play the role of facilitator in task force sessions bringing together medical providers, payers and consumers. It would seem that reforms coming from such a group would have a much better chance of gaining public support than bills coming from congress.
The items found on this blog were written during the past few years and strictly reflect my own opinions. Because these articles deal with difficult issues they are bound to be controversial. They reflect my personal analysis based on the limited information that I have. I am certainly no expert and fully respect different opinions. Difficult issues would not be difficult if there were clear-cut answers. Although you will see in reading some of my material, I don't like being pigeonholed with a label, I will admit to being politically independent with a tendency to be more conservative fiscally and slightly more liberal with regard to social issues. Having lived through the 1940's, I have a great appreciation for the sacrifices made by our armed forces and, in fact, all Americans during World War II. The greatness of this country shone bright as we rehabilitated and rebuilt our enemies after winning that war. I am very patriotic and proud of our country. While we are far from perfect, we're not as far from that ideal as most other countries in the world.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Health Care and The Federal Government
The current debate surrounding the federal government’s proposed legislation regarding health care has become very heated and unusually controversial. There appears to be several primary reasons for this. While most people recognize that there are significant issues with our overall health care system that need to be addressed, there is widespread reluctance to having the government take over running the system. Not only do people have little trust/confidence in government institutions (e.g. in a recent poll, only 14% rate the performance of congress good or excellent) but also past performance of large government run programs is abysmal (e.g. Medicare, social security and the postal service are all going broke). In spite of the problems with our health care system, the U.S. health care system remains the best in the world and the best that humans have yet devised. Thus, wholesale replacement of the system, especially by one run by the federal government, is strongly opposed. Add to this the fear that people foresee if federal bureaucrats are interposed between them and their physicians in making medical decisions and the rationale of the opposition is understandable.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment